Will New Jersey approve gay marriage bill? - new jersey gay crusin spots
I cross my fingers in this case.
If the full Assembly votes must sign Corzine, the bill. He is a democrat. Christie (the opposition) has already said he will not sign.
"The same-sex marriage: Christie said he preferred to form the law of New Jersey, which allows same-sex civil unions but would any bill to legalize same-sex marriage veto. [52]" I also believe that marriage only a man and a woman .... If a law was to legalize marriage between same-sex between, came into my office as governor, I have the right to veto. "Source: Wikipedia.
Thursday, February 11, 2010
New Jersey Gay Crusin Spots Will New Jersey Approve Gay Marriage Bill?
9 comments:
I find it appalling that there is never a ban on gay marriage, first in one state. Christians seem to interpret the words of the Bible wrong. The jealous (well, some zealous Christians) insist that the good book says that homosexuality is wrong and immoral ... Yes, you can say, but he also says he is not a mortal sin, the terrible evil. As an atheist, I think it's ridiculous, but I digress. God does not condemn homosexuality, according to the Bible, and said he had never force anyone to change in order to "perfect" in his image. If the God depicted in the book are (unlikely), do not send people into a state of eternal damnation for such a small aspect of his life.
Now this is the case, why is it that our government represent and defend the rights of all who would prefer to consider the morality of homosexuality into a religion of others? Why such a union are not allowed other than the end of the parties?
It makes no sense. I do not.
I find it appalling that there is never a ban on gay marriage, first in one state. Christians seem to interpret the words of the Bible wrong. The jealous (well, some zealous Christians) insist that the good book says that homosexuality is wrong and immoral ... Yes, you can say, but he also says he is not a mortal sin, the terrible evil. As an atheist, I think it's ridiculous, but I digress. God does not condemn homosexuality, according to the Bible, and said he had never force anyone to change in order to "perfect" in his image. If the God depicted in the book are (unlikely), do not send people into a state of eternal damnation for such a small aspect of his life.
Now this is the case, why is it that our government represent and defend the rights of all who would prefer to consider the morality of homosexuality into a religion of others? Why such a union are not allowed other than the end of the parties?
It makes no sense. I do not.
I find it appalling that there is never a ban on gay marriage, first in one state. Christians seem to interpret the words of the Bible wrong. The jealous (well, some zealous Christians) insist that the good book says that homosexuality is wrong and immoral ... Yes, you can say, but he also says he is not a mortal sin, the terrible evil. As an atheist, I think it's ridiculous, but I digress. God does not condemn homosexuality, according to the Bible, and said he had never force anyone to change in order to "perfect" in his image. If the God depicted in the book are (unlikely), do not send people into a state of eternal damnation for such a small aspect of his life.
Now this is the case, why is it that our government represent and defend the rights of all who would prefer to consider the morality of homosexuality into a religion of others? Why such a union are not allowed other than the end of the parties?
It makes no sense. I do not.
lol i live in New York, and I hope they do.
lol i live in New York, and I hope they do.
I find it appalling that there is never a ban on gay marriage, first in one state. Christians seem to interpret the words of the Bible wrong. The jealous (well, some zealous Christians) insist that the Good Book says that homosexuality is wrong and immoral ... Yes, you can say, but he also says he is not a mortal sin, the terrible evil. As an atheist, I think it's ridiculous, but I digress. God does not condemn homosexuality, according to the Bible, and said he had never force anyone to change in order to "perfect" in his image. If the God depicted in the book are (unlikely), do not send people into a state of eternal damnation for such a small aspect of his life.
Now this is the case, why is it that our government represent and defend the rights of all who would prefer to consider the morality of homosexuality into a religion of others? Why such a union are not allowed other than the end of the parties?
It makes no sense. I do not.
I find it appalling that there is never a ban on gay marriage, first in one state. Christians seem to interpret the words of the Bible wrong. The jealous (well, some zealous Christians) insist that the Good Book says that homosexuality is wrong and immoral ... Yes, you can say, but he also says he is not a mortal sin, the terrible evil. As an atheist, I think it's ridiculous, but I digress. God does not condemn homosexuality, according to the Bible, and said he had never force anyone to change in order to "perfect" in his image. If the God depicted in the book are (unlikely), do not send people into a state of eternal damnation for such a small aspect of his life.
Now this is the case, why is it that our government represent and defend the rights of all who would prefer to consider the morality of homosexuality into a religion of others? Why such a union are not allowed other than the end of the parties?
It makes no sense. I do not.
I find it appalling that there is never a ban on gay marriage, first in one state. Christians seem to interpret the words of the Bible wrong. The jealous (well, some zealous Christians) insist that the good book says that homosexuality is wrong and immoral ... Yes, you can say, but he also says he is not a mortal sin, the terrible evil. As an atheist, I think it's ridiculous, but I digress. God does not condemn homosexuality, according to the Bible, and said he had never force anyone to change in order to "perfect" in his image. If the God depicted in the book are (unlikely), do not send people into a state of eternal damnation for such a small aspect of his life.
Now this is the case, why is it that our government represent and defend the rights of all who would prefer to consider the morality of homosexuality into a religion of others? Why such a union are not allowed other than the end of the parties?
It makes no sense. I do not.
Stop screws society gay marriage
Post a Comment